Skip to main content

Cursor AI Review: Is the AI Code Editor Worth It?

I've been using Cursor as my main code editor for a while now, and enough people have asked whether it's worth switching to that a proper review felt overdue. Short version: for me, yes — but with caveats.

What is Cursor?

Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code. That means every extension, theme, and keybinding you already use in VS Code works here, but with AI woven directly into the editing experience instead of bolted on as a plugin. It's made by Anysphere and can run models from OpenAI and Anthropic under the hood.

What I like

  • Tab completion is uncanny. Cursor predicts your next edit — not just the rest of the line, but the next change across the file. Once you get used to hitting Tab, going back to a plain editor feels slow.
  • The Composer / Agent mode. You describe a change in plain language and it edits multiple files at once, showing you a diff to accept or reject. For refactors and boilerplate, this saves real time.
  • It understands your codebase. Cursor indexes your project so its answers reference your actual functions and files, not generic snippets. Asking “where is X handled?” usually just works.
  • You stay in control. Every AI edit is a diff you approve. Nothing changes behind your back.

What could be better

  • Price. The Pro plan is $20/month. Worth it if you code daily, but the free tier is limited enough that heavy users hit the wall fast.
  • It gets confident and wrong. On larger or unusual changes it sometimes edits the wrong thing or invents an API. You still need to read every diff — treat it as a fast junior, not an oracle.
  • Upstream lag. Because it's a VS Code fork, it occasionally trails the latest VS Code releases and a few extensions behave oddly.

Verdict

If you write code every day, Cursor is one of the few AI tools that genuinely changes how fast you work rather than just being a novelty. The Tab completion and multi-file Composer are the standout features. Just keep your hand on the wheel — review the diffs, and don't merge anything you don't understand.

Rating: 4.5 / 5 — the best AI coding experience I've used, held back only by price and the occasional overconfident edit.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MacBook Pro M5 vs M5 Pro: Which One Should You Actually Buy?

Apple's latest 14-inch MacBook Pro comes in two very different flavors: the base M5 and the step-up M5 Pro . On paper they look similar — same gorgeous Liquid Retina XDR display, same design — but under the hood the gap is bigger than the names suggest. Here's a clear, no-hype breakdown, with concrete use cases so you can match the chip to your work. Quick spec comparison Spec M5 M5 Pro CPU 10-core (4 performance + 6 efficiency) Up to 18-core (6 performance + 12 efficiency) GPU 10-core Up to 20-core Neural Engine 16-core 16-core Memory bandwidth 153 GB/s 307 GB/s (roughly double) Unified memory 16 / 24 / 32 GB 24 / 48 / 64 GB Max storage Up to 4 TB SSD Up to 8 TB SSD Battery (video playback) Up to 24 hours Up to 22 hours Media engines Single encode/ProRes engine More encode/ProRes engines (higher configs) What actually changes between them More cores — the M5 Pro nearly doubles CPU cores and adds GPU cores, so sustained, multi-threaded work finishe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Running a Server on a Mac Mini: Apple Silicon vs the Home-Server Field

The Mac Mini has quietly become one of the most interesting home-server boxes you can buy. It’s tiny, nearly silent, sips power, and Apple Silicon punches far above its weight. But is it actually the right machine to run your services on — or are you paying an Apple tax for a job a $400 mini PC does better? Let’s put it head-to-head. Why a Mac Mini makes a surprisingly good server Three things make Apple Silicon compelling as an always-on machine: Performance per watt. This is the headline. An M4 Mini idles at just a few watts and rarely pushes past ~35W under load, while delivering multicore performance that embarrasses machines drawing twice the power. Silence. Under typical server loads the fan is inaudible. If your “server” lives in a living room or bedroom, this matters more than any benchmark. Footprint. It’s the size of a coaster and runs cool, so it tucks anywhere. The honest catch It’s not all upside: macOS isn’t...
Post a Comment
Read more