I've been using Cursor as my main code editor for a while now, and enough people have asked whether it's worth switching to that a proper review felt overdue. Short version: for me, yes — but with caveats.
What is Cursor?
Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code. That means every extension, theme, and keybinding you already use in VS Code works here, but with AI woven directly into the editing experience instead of bolted on as a plugin. It's made by Anysphere and can run models from OpenAI and Anthropic under the hood.
What I like
- Tab completion is uncanny. Cursor predicts your next edit — not just the rest of the line, but the next change across the file. Once you get used to hitting Tab, going back to a plain editor feels slow.
- The Composer / Agent mode. You describe a change in plain language and it edits multiple files at once, showing you a diff to accept or reject. For refactors and boilerplate, this saves real time.
- It understands your codebase. Cursor indexes your project so its answers reference your actual functions and files, not generic snippets. Asking “where is X handled?” usually just works.
- You stay in control. Every AI edit is a diff you approve. Nothing changes behind your back.
What could be better
- Price. The Pro plan is $20/month. Worth it if you code daily, but the free tier is limited enough that heavy users hit the wall fast.
- It gets confident and wrong. On larger or unusual changes it sometimes edits the wrong thing or invents an API. You still need to read every diff — treat it as a fast junior, not an oracle.
- Upstream lag. Because it's a VS Code fork, it occasionally trails the latest VS Code releases and a few extensions behave oddly.
Verdict
If you write code every day, Cursor is one of the few AI tools that genuinely changes how fast you work rather than just being a novelty. The Tab completion and multi-file Composer are the standout features. Just keep your hand on the wheel — review the diffs, and don't merge anything you don't understand.
Rating: 4.5 / 5 — the best AI coding experience I've used, held back only by price and the occasional overconfident edit.
Comments
Post a Comment