Skip to main content

Starlink Mini Review: One Month of Internet Anywhere

I've been running the Starlink Mini for just over a month now — in my car, on hiking trips, and pretty much anywhere I want a connection off the grid. Here's an honest rundown after real-world use.

My setup

I don't use the Mini as home internet. For me it's about connectivity anywhere: I keep it in the car for a signal on the road, and I bring it along when hiking so I can get online during breaks or from a remote spot. If you need the internet where cell coverage gives up, that's exactly the gap this fills.

Performance

Speed has genuinely not been an issue. On a good placement with a clear view of the sky, I've seen up to 200 Mbps — more than enough for video calls, uploads, and anything I throw at it. In the car it holds a strong signal as long as there aren't trees directly overhead. That's the one rule you learn fast: the dish needs an open view up. Block the sky and the connection suffers.

Power

The Mini is easy to keep running. In the car I just plug it into a power outlet. Out on the mountain I run it off a portable power station, or a battery pack I picked up specifically for the Mini when I'm mobile or stopped for a hiking break. Powering it has never been the limiting factor.

The catch: cost

The honest downside is the price. I'm on the unlimited roaming plan so I can use it anywhere without worrying about data, and that tier costs more than the standard fixed plans. If constant mobile access is what you need, it's worth it — but go in knowing the subscription is the real ongoing expense, not the hardware.

Verdict

After a month, the Starlink Mini has done exactly what I hoped: reliable internet in places that never had it. If your use case looks anything like mine — car, hiking, remote work away from cell towers — I can genuinely recommend it. Just keep the sky clear above the dish and budget for the roaming plan, and you'll have connectivity almost anywhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cursor AI Review: Is the AI Code Editor Worth It?

I've been using Cursor as my main code editor for a while now, and enough people have asked whether it's worth switching to that a proper review felt overdue. Short version: for me, yes — but with caveats. What is Cursor? Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code. That means every extension, theme, and keybinding you already use in VS Code works here, but with AI woven directly into the editing experience instead of bolted on as a plugin. It's made by Anysphere and can run models from OpenAI and Anthropic under the hood. What I like Tab completion is uncanny. Cursor predicts your next edit — not just the rest of the line, but the next change across the file. Once you get used to hitting Tab, going back to a plain editor feels slow. The Composer / Agent mode. You describe a change in plain language and it edits multiple files at once, showing you a diff to accept or reject. For refactors and boilerplate, this saves real time. It unde...

How I used Google Sheets and Apps Script

Google Sheet is one of the most powerful spreadsheet application that exists online, rivaling with Microsoft's Excel. One of the main strengths is its strong support for collaboration with other users, much easier and popular than collaboration tools with Microsoft Office. Aside from plain spreadsheet, it also supports extensions such as macro. If you are familiar with macros on other office tools, they work almost the same. However, the most extension I use and tinker with is the Apps Scipt . Apps Script Extension One of the challenges I faced recently is how do I track or monitor reports in our department if they are submitted on time or worst, forgotten due to lack of better monitoring tools. So I thought if there can be simple applications that can be deployed or use by a more general user to allow reminding periodically what reports are approaching due dates or those that are past dues. Then I looked for a way, instead of creating a full blown app from scratc...

MacBook Pro M5 vs M5 Pro: Which One Should You Actually Buy?

Apple's latest 14-inch MacBook Pro comes in two very different flavors: the base M5 and the step-up M5 Pro . On paper they look similar — same gorgeous Liquid Retina XDR display, same design — but under the hood the gap is bigger than the names suggest. Here's a clear, no-hype breakdown, with concrete use cases so you can match the chip to your work. Quick spec comparison Spec M5 M5 Pro CPU 10-core (4 performance + 6 efficiency) Up to 18-core (6 performance + 12 efficiency) GPU 10-core Up to 20-core Neural Engine 16-core 16-core Memory bandwidth 153 GB/s 307 GB/s (roughly double) Unified memory 16 / 24 / 32 GB 24 / 48 / 64 GB Max storage Up to 4 TB SSD Up to 8 TB SSD Battery (video playback) Up to 24 hours Up to 22 hours Media engines Single encode/ProRes engine More encode/ProRes engines (higher configs) What actually changes between them More cores — the M5 Pro nearly doubles CPU cores and adds GPU cores, so sustained, multi-threaded work finishe...