By the spring of 2004, Google had a problem that most companies would kill for: it was making too much money to stay private. Search advertising had turned Larry Page and Sergey Brin's dorm-room project into a cash machine, and once employee stock options pushed its shareholder count past the threshold that triggers mandatory financial disclosure under U.S. securities law, the choice was made for them. Google would have to open its books either way. If the numbers were going public, the founders reasoned, the stock might as well go with them.
They were not happy about it. Page and Brin had watched the dot-com boom mint paper billionaires and then vaporize them, and they distrusted the quarterly-earnings treadmill that public markets impose. So when Google finally filed to go public, it did so on its own terms — and picked a fight with Wall Street on the way out the door.
Breaking the underwriters' game
The traditional IPO is a clubby affair. A company hires investment banks, the banks set a price, and then they parcel out shares to favored institutional clients. Those insiders often watch the stock "pop" on the first day of trading — a tidy profit for them, and a sign that the company sold itself too cheaply, leaving money on the table. Google's founders looked at that arrangement and saw a rigged game that rewarded the middlemen.
Their answer was a modified Dutch auction. Instead of letting bankers hand-pick who got shares, Google opened the bidding to anyone with a brokerage account. Investors large and small submitted the number of shares they wanted and the price they were willing to pay. The system then found the highest price at which all the offered shares would sell — the "clearing price" — and everyone who bid at or above it paid that same amount. It was the OpenIPO model pioneered by banker Bill Hambrecht, and Google was the biggest company ever to attempt it. Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse First Boston led a syndicate of some two dozen underwriters, but the auction, in theory, took the pricing power out of their hands.
It did not go smoothly. The initial filing floated a price range of $108 to $135 a share — numbers that struck many analysts as greedy for an unproven business model. Demand in the auction came in softer than hoped, the broader tech market was sagging, and the mechanics confused ordinary investors. In the final days before launch, Google slashed the range to $85 to $95 and cut the number of shares on offer. The stock ultimately priced at $85.
An owner's manual and a Playboy problem
Tucked inside the sober legalese of Google's prospectus was something no bank would have written: a letter from Larry Page titled "An Owner's Manual for Google's Shareholders." It opened with a line that has been quoted ever since — "Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one" — and it warned prospective investors, in plain English, that the founders would not manage the company for smooth quarterly numbers, would make large and unusual bets, and expected some of them to fail. To make sure they could keep steering, Page and Brin built in a dual-class share structure: the shares sold to the public carried one vote each, while the founders' Class B shares carried ten. Wall Street bristled at the loss of control. Google shrugged.
The company even turned its filing into a joke. Its original registration announced it would raise up to $2,718,281,828 — the mathematical constant e, spelled out to the dollar. A later financial target came in at a figure matching the digits of a golden-ratio calculation. The message was unmistakable: the nerds were running this one.
Then came the near-disaster. During the SEC-mandated "quiet period," when a company going public is supposed to say nothing that could hype its stock, an interview with Page and Brin appeared in Playboy. Regulators were not amused. Rather than scrap the whole offering, Google's lawyers scrambled to file the entire interview as an amendment to the prospectus, defusing the violation. The IPO survived by a technicality.
The number that wouldn't behave
On August 19, 2004, Google began trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker GOOG. It sold 19,605,052 shares, raised about $1.67 billion, and opened the day valued at roughly $23 billion. By the closing bell the stock stood at $100.34, up about 18 percent.
Critics called the auction a flop, pointing to the slashed price and shrunken size. Defenders countered that a modest 18 percent bump was exactly the point — the auction had left far less money on the table than the typical first-day moonshot, meaning Google, not a handful of insider clients, captured most of its own value. Both sides were, in a way, right. The Dutch auction never became Wall Street's default; the old system had too many powerful people invested in keeping it. But Google had proven a public company could go public without kissing the ring, and had walked away with a war chest and a founder-controlled voting structure that would shape every decision to come.
The money was now in the bank. Next in the series: Part 11 — The Product Explosion, when a flood of cash and a policy called "20% time" gave the world Gmail, Google Maps, and the sense that Google could build anything.
Comments
Post a Comment