Skip to main content

The Rise of Google, Part 15: Google in China

Google in China

🎬 Prefer to watch? Here's the 60-second version:

Watch on YouTube ▶

📚 The Rise of Google — a 20-part series. See all parts »  |  « Part 14: Chrome

For most of its rise, Google treated the open web as a birthright. Information wanted to be found, links wanted to be followed, and the company's job was simply to be the best door in. Then it walked into the one market where the door came with a lock, a guard, and a list of things you were not allowed to say. China would become the hardest test yet of Google's founding promise — the place where "don't be evil" stopped being a slogan and started being a decision with no clean answer.

The bargain

Google had offered a Chinese-language version of google.com since September 2000, but the site sat on the far side of the Great Firewall — slow, throttled, and periodically blocked. To actually compete with the homegrown giant Baidu, Google needed servers and a license inside the country. In July 2005 it hired Kai-Fu Lee, a marquee ex-Microsoft executive, to build a Beijing engineering office and lead the push.

The catch was written into the law: a search engine operating on Chinese soil had to filter its results. On 26 January 2006, Google launched google.cn — and for the first time in its history, it deliberately hid pages from users. Searches for "Tiananmen," "Falun Gong," or "Dalai Lama" returned scrubbed lists, with a small disclosure noting that some results had been removed to comply with local law. Google's reasoning was coldly utilitarian: a censored Google that Chinese users could actually reach was, it argued, better than a free Google they mostly couldn't. Co-founder Sergey Brin, who spent his early childhood in the Soviet Union, admitted he was deeply uneasy with the compromise. When U.S. lawmakers hauled American tech firms before Congress in early 2006 to answer for cooperating with Chinese censorship, the criticism stung precisely because it was aimed at a company that had built its brand on openness.

Four years, and a share that never came

The bargain never fully paid off. Baidu understood the local market, the language, and the regulators far better, and Google spent four years as the well-funded runner-up. Its search share peaked at roughly 36% in August 2009 — respectable anywhere else, but a distant second at home. Friction mounted: YouTube was blocked in March 2009 over footage from Tibet, and other services flickered on and off at the government's discretion. That September, Kai-Fu Lee abruptly departed to start his own venture fund, and the mood inside Google China darkened.

Then came the attack. Beginning in mid-2009 and running through December, a sophisticated intrusion later dubbed Operation Aurora — named by McAfee researcher Dmitri Alperovitch after a string found in the malware — penetrated Google and more than twenty other companies, including Adobe, Juniper, and Rackspace. Investigators concluded the campaign originated in China and reached for the crown jewels: source-code repositories, and the Gmail accounts of Chinese human-rights activists. For Google, this was no longer an abstract debate about filtered links. It was a break-in.

The exit

On 12 January 2010, Chief Legal Officer David Drummond published a blog post titled "A New Approach to China." Google announced it was no longer willing to censor google.cn and was prepared to shut its Chinese operations entirely if it couldn't run an uncensored search engine "within the law, if at all." U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton weighed in within hours, condemning the attacks. It was an extraordinary move: a corporation publicly picking a fight with a government over free expression, and betting a billion-user market on principle.

The resolution was quieter than the declaration. On 22 March 2010, rather than flip a censorship switch back on, Google redirected mainland traffic from google.cn to google.com.hk — its Hong Kong site, which sat outside most mainland censorship rules and returned unfiltered results. It was a legal sidestep dressed as a retreat: Google could tell itself it had stopped censoring, while Beijing could let the Firewall do the filtering instead. Members of the public left flowers at Google's Beijing headquarters, an "illegal flower tribute" to a search engine. The Great Firewall quietly absorbed the rest. Within a few years Google's mainland search share collapsed toward the low single digits, and the company that had promised to organize the world's information found that one-fifth of the world's people were, once again, out of reach.

Google had chosen its conscience over its market — and lost the market. But the fight revealed something the company preferred to keep hidden: to serve billions of queries and survive nation-state attacks, Google had quietly become one of the largest builders of computers on Earth. Next time: inside the secret data-center empire behind the search box.


🔗 Explore more from Syncster

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cursor AI Review: Is the AI Code Editor Worth It?

I've been using Cursor as my main code editor for a while now, and enough people have asked whether it's worth switching to that a proper review felt overdue. Short version: for me, yes — but with caveats. What is Cursor? Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code. That means every extension, theme, and keybinding you already use in VS Code works here, but with AI woven directly into the editing experience instead of bolted on as a plugin. It's made by Anysphere and can run models from OpenAI and Anthropic under the hood. What I like Tab completion is uncanny. Cursor predicts your next edit — not just the rest of the line, but the next change across the file. Once you get used to hitting Tab, going back to a plain editor feels slow. The Composer / Agent mode. You describe a change in plain language and it edits multiple files at once, showing you a diff to accept or reject. For refactors and boilerplate, this saves real time. It unde...

MacBook Pro M5 vs M5 Pro: Which One Should You Actually Buy?

Apple's latest 14-inch MacBook Pro comes in two very different flavors: the base M5 and the step-up M5 Pro . On paper they look similar — same gorgeous Liquid Retina XDR display, same design — but under the hood the gap is bigger than the names suggest. Here's a clear, no-hype breakdown, with concrete use cases so you can match the chip to your work. Quick spec comparison Spec M5 M5 Pro CPU 10-core (4 performance + 6 efficiency) Up to 18-core (6 performance + 12 efficiency) GPU 10-core Up to 20-core Neural Engine 16-core 16-core Memory bandwidth 153 GB/s 307 GB/s (roughly double) Unified memory 16 / 24 / 32 GB 24 / 48 / 64 GB Max storage Up to 4 TB SSD Up to 8 TB SSD Battery (video playback) Up to 24 hours Up to 22 hours Media engines Single encode/ProRes engine More encode/ProRes engines (higher configs) What actually changes between them More cores — the M5 Pro nearly doubles CPU cores and adds GPU cores, so sustained, multi-threaded work finishe...

How I used Google Sheets and Apps Script

Google Sheet is one of the most powerful spreadsheet application that exists online, rivaling with Microsoft's Excel. One of the main strengths is its strong support for collaboration with other users, much easier and popular than collaboration tools with Microsoft Office. Aside from plain spreadsheet, it also supports extensions such as macro. If you are familiar with macros on other office tools, they work almost the same. However, the most extension I use and tinker with is the Apps Scipt . Apps Script Extension One of the challenges I faced recently is how do I track or monitor reports in our department if they are submitted on time or worst, forgotten due to lack of better monitoring tools. So I thought if there can be simple applications that can be deployed or use by a more general user to allow reminding periodically what reports are approaching due dates or those that are past dues. Then I looked for a way, instead of creating a full blown app from scratc...