Skip to main content

The Rise of NVIDIA, Part 1: A Booth at Denny's

A Booth at Denny's

🎬 Prefer to watch? Here's the 60-second version:

Watch on YouTube ▶

🎮 The Rise of NVIDIA — a 20-part series. See all parts »

Every empire has an origin myth, and Silicon Valley's are usually told in garages. Nvidia's begins somewhere humbler and a little stranger: a corner booth at a Denny's on Berryessa Road in East San Jose, where the coffee was bottomless and nobody minded three engineers hunched over legal pads for hours at a stretch.

It was early 1993. The men doing the hunching were Jensen Huang, Chris Malachowsky, and Curtis Priem. They were not dreamers with nothing to lose — they were established engineers with steady paychecks, families, and mortgages. What they shared was a conviction that the personal computer was about to change shape, and that almost nobody in the industry was ready for it.

Three careers worth betting

Jensen Huang was the one who could talk. Born in Taipei in 1963 and raised partly in the United States, he had earned an engineering degree from Oregon State and a master's from Stanford, then gone to work designing microprocessors at AMD before moving to the chip company LSI Logic. By thirty he was running a business unit — young for the role, and restless.

Chris Malachowsky and Curtis Priem came from Sun Microsystems, the workstation powerhouse that defined serious computing in the late 1980s. Priem was the graphics man: he had architected display chips at IBM and then Sun's GX graphics processor, and he understood, deep in his bones, how to make silicon paint pixels. Malachowsky was the systems and chip engineer, a builder who knew how to turn a clever idea into hardware that actually shipped.

There is a detail in the Denny's story that Huang himself likes to tell, because it is too good to leave out: as a teenager, he had worked at a Denny's — washing dishes, busing tables, waiting on customers. The company that would one day be worth trillions was plotted in the same kind of vinyl booth where its future CEO had once cleared plates. He has said the job taught him humility and hustle. Both would come in handy.

The bet nobody else wanted

The idea on those legal pads was deceptively simple. Computers were getting faster, but the way they drew images to the screen was still crude — flat, two-dimensional, painfully slow when asked to do anything ambitious. The three founders believed the PC was destined to become a 3D graphics machine, capable of rendering worlds instead of just windows. And they believed the force that would pay for all of it, the relentless engine of demand, would be video games.

That was the contrarian part. In 1993, "graphics chip for games" did not sound like the foundation of a great company. Games were a niche, a toy market, beneath the notice of the serious workstation and enterprise crowd the founders had come from. Betting your career on entertainment software felt reckless. But the founders saw it the other way around: gamers were the most demanding customers imaginable, forever wanting more speed and more realism, and a company that could satisfy them would end up building the fastest consumer hardware on Earth.

They incorporated on April 5, 1993. The early name was a placeholder joke as much as anything — internally they labeled their files "NV," shorthand for "next version," because they didn't yet know what they were making, only that it would be the next version of everything. When it came time to choose a real name, they reached for the Latin word invidia, meaning envy — the feeling they wanted competitors to have. Nvidia it became.

Almost nothing, and everything to prove

What they had at the start was closer to nothing than to a company. A few tens of thousands of dollars of their own money. No product. No customers. No office worth the name — the real work happened in a booth and, soon after, in cramped rented space. The graphics-chip market was already crowded with dozens of hungry startups, most of which have since vanished from memory. The odds of joining them in obscurity were overwhelming.

But the founders had two things that money can't buy on day one: a clear thesis about where computing was heading, and the technical credibility to chase it. They knew chips. They knew graphics. And they had a conviction, unfashionable at the time, that the humble video game would drag the entire semiconductor industry into a new era.

Within months, that conviction would attract the attention of Silicon Valley's most storied investors, and the "next version" would need to become something real — a first chip, ambitious to the point of hubris, that would nearly kill the company before it ever found its footing.

Next time: the money arrives, the NV1 is born, and Nvidia's first big bet goes spectacularly, dangerously sideways.


🔗 Explore more from Syncster

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cursor AI Review: Is the AI Code Editor Worth It?

I've been using Cursor as my main code editor for a while now, and enough people have asked whether it's worth switching to that a proper review felt overdue. Short version: for me, yes — but with caveats. What is Cursor? Cursor is an AI-first code editor built as a fork of VS Code. That means every extension, theme, and keybinding you already use in VS Code works here, but with AI woven directly into the editing experience instead of bolted on as a plugin. It's made by Anysphere and can run models from OpenAI and Anthropic under the hood. What I like Tab completion is uncanny. Cursor predicts your next edit — not just the rest of the line, but the next change across the file. Once you get used to hitting Tab, going back to a plain editor feels slow. The Composer / Agent mode. You describe a change in plain language and it edits multiple files at once, showing you a diff to accept or reject. For refactors and boilerplate, this saves real time. It unde...

How I used Google Sheets and Apps Script

Google Sheet is one of the most powerful spreadsheet application that exists online, rivaling with Microsoft's Excel. One of the main strengths is its strong support for collaboration with other users, much easier and popular than collaboration tools with Microsoft Office. Aside from plain spreadsheet, it also supports extensions such as macro. If you are familiar with macros on other office tools, they work almost the same. However, the most extension I use and tinker with is the Apps Scipt . Apps Script Extension One of the challenges I faced recently is how do I track or monitor reports in our department if they are submitted on time or worst, forgotten due to lack of better monitoring tools. So I thought if there can be simple applications that can be deployed or use by a more general user to allow reminding periodically what reports are approaching due dates or those that are past dues. Then I looked for a way, instead of creating a full blown app from scratc...

MacBook Pro M5 vs M5 Pro: Which One Should You Actually Buy?

Apple's latest 14-inch MacBook Pro comes in two very different flavors: the base M5 and the step-up M5 Pro . On paper they look similar — same gorgeous Liquid Retina XDR display, same design — but under the hood the gap is bigger than the names suggest. Here's a clear, no-hype breakdown, with concrete use cases so you can match the chip to your work. Quick spec comparison Spec M5 M5 Pro CPU 10-core (4 performance + 6 efficiency) Up to 18-core (6 performance + 12 efficiency) GPU 10-core Up to 20-core Neural Engine 16-core 16-core Memory bandwidth 153 GB/s 307 GB/s (roughly double) Unified memory 16 / 24 / 32 GB 24 / 48 / 64 GB Max storage Up to 4 TB SSD Up to 8 TB SSD Battery (video playback) Up to 24 hours Up to 22 hours Media engines Single encode/ProRes engine More encode/ProRes engines (higher configs) What actually changes between them More cores — the M5 Pro nearly doubles CPU cores and adds GPU cores, so sustained, multi-threaded work finishe...